Responsabilidade de proteger uma discussão conceitual dos efeitos da aplicação da responsabilidade de proteger

Abstract

The policy states was not to intervene in conflicts that occur within the territory of the state bodies and after the Cold War humanitarian intervention gained ground in the international scenario. The question was whether the unilateral use of force had priority that emphasizes up questions about human life and preserve the humanitarian law, or if the goals prevail over economic, political, diplomatic, geopolitical interests among others. In response to discussion of the debate, with the support of Canada, was created in 2005 the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty where the right of interference resurfaced. In 2001, the Canadian initiative arose the term responsibility to protect that said the responsibility to prevent, react and rebuild. The right of intervention and humanitarian law sought to prioritize the rights of stakeholders, while the responsibility to protect doctrine seeks the opposite. The concept of human security was implemented by the Canadian initiative, but this was embedded in issues of conflict prevention as a precautionary reasons. The realist theory believes that there is no higher authority that can determine or impose rules where the State is obliged to follow. The Security Council of the UN has the legitimacy to authorize interventions in other countries, but has no standing to compel states that conflict to adopt measures internally, because this rule would hurt the sovereignty of the states being aware that the quest for power United may be reflected in the search for security and survival. Brazil has contributed a lot in the international arena with the discussion responsibility to protect and implement the responsibility to protect, and has participated in UN peacekeeping missions to great effect in Haiti with MINUSTAH mission Key words: Responsibility to Protect, humanitarian law, sovereignty, international security, international law, Brazilian Foreign Policy